Firearms regulation Clarification Please

[BillyP]

Hi, I am headed out hunting with my uncle this weekend and am hoping some of you can help clarify an issue regarding firearms regulations;

So I have taken my hunters education and Canadian firearms safety course about 10 years ago (when i was a minor), but I only recently applied for a PAL which hasn't yet come in the mail. So it is my understanding that I can still go hunting with my uncle and shoot his rifles so long as I am under his "Direct Supervision". I've already bought my General Whitetail and two supplementary tags, but my question is whether I am actually allowed to fire his rifles and use my tags on any animal we get lucky enough to harvest, given that I dont currently have my PAL?

If anyone can help clarify this, and maybe point me to the applicable documentation where it states this, that would be great!

thanks in advance

[Ryry4]

"Direct supervision" usually means within arms length. Yes you are good to go and use his rifles. Shoot straight and have fun.

[duffy4]

"Direct supervision generally means to be physically present, or within an immediate distance, such as on the same floor, and available to respond to the needs ..."


I don't know where the "arms length" came from?

I can't imagine an cop saying "10 feet is too far away you have to be 4 no 3 feet away."

[elkhunter11]

I don't know where the "arms length" came from?



It is a term commonly used by instructors teaching the course.

I can't imagine an cop saying "10 feet is too far away you have to be 4 no 3 feet away."

So how far would be too far?15ft?25ft?50ft?

[Lucite]

The whole arms length rule is so that if the rifle malfunctions or something else happens the person with the PAL can intervene before any harm is done. At least that's how the guy at the range explained it to me.

[Redfrog]

The whole arms length rule is so that if the rifle malfunctions or something else happens the person with the PAL can intervene before any harm is done. At least that's how the guy at the range explained it to me.

This is correct. Direct supervision interpretation is 'arm's length' This is from the firearms instructors course. I've taught firearms safety since 1975 and the federal firearms since it came in and have heard nothing different.

Another route to take is contact CFC for a status report on your application. Askf or a file number as well. If it is in the mail or very near completion you may be good to go just borrowing the registered firearms and producing your file number if asked.

[Dusty Rhodes]

To BillyP
Check page 22 in the 2011 Alberta Guide To Hunting Regulations (I'm sure you have one), at the bottom of the right-hand column, under 'Rules for all Partners'. It uses the term "direct communication"; (not "direct supervision") and gives a quick definition.
In that paragraph, I don't know whether the phrase "does not need any priority" includes the P.A.L. (firearm stuff) or just the WIN, hunting license and tags (wildlife stuff). I was under the impression that anyone who carries a firearm has to have one. I think the Firearm regulations state that you need one. If I were you, I would call the SRD and check. If you don't get a definitive answer from them, ask the RCMP.
You don't want to get caught without a PAL if you need one even under a 'Partner' license. They have no sense of humor when it comes to firearm infractions.

[elkhunter11]

In that paragraph, I don't know whether the phrase "does not need any priority" includes the P.A.L. (firearm stuff) or just the WIN, hunting license and tags (wildlife stuff).

That phrase in no way refers to a PAL.

I was under the impression that anyone who carries a firearm has to have one.

Your impression is incorrect.

[rottie]

Dusty to use a firearm a person does not need a PAL if they are direct supervision of a person who does posses a PAL.
The hunting Regs and Federal Firearm laws are two totally different issues.

[hal53]

^^^X2...wonder if the OP is so totally confused now...he just says forget it..????? LOL

[BillyP]

Thank you everyone for your responses, I think it is clear to me now. FYI the general exception that permits this action is in the Firearms act under section 112.

112. (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), every person commits an offence who, not having previously committed an offence under this subsection or subsection 91(1) or 92(1) of the Criminal Code, possesses a firearm that is neither a prohibited firearm nor a restricted firearm without being the holder of a registration certificate for the firearm.

Exceptions

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to

(a) a person who possesses a firearm while the person is under the direct and immediate supervision of a person who may lawfully possess it, for the purpose of using it in a manner in which the supervising person may lawfully use it;



Thanks again for your help.
BP

[Dusty Rhodes]

I didn't realize that there were any exceptions to the PL rule. Thanx for the info.