Gun Sense Video

[Boss442]

Nice to see a good video for common sense gun laws! Tired of seeing NRA ***** clown types making all gun owners look dumb!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3iJ66UMDhI

[oldgutpile]

I believe it is in the best interest of every gun-owner, to be pro-active and try to weed out those who should not have firearms. It kinda makes the whole "PAL" system better, in that you don't have to wait to be approved after the purchase, but are in actuality, pre-approved going into a sale.
This mandate reflects that it is the person behind the trigger, not the gun, that kills people, and if we are in favor of policing our own, who can argue against the right to own firearms?

[Chuck_Wagon]

The Gun Owners of Vermont, GunSenseVT Exposed & the Vermont Citizens Defense League have assembled this short video to explain the problem with Universal Background Checks that are being proposed in Vermont and pushed by ONE group with out-of-state funding. (Anti-gun Bloomberg coalition)

http://gunownersofvermont.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/GOV-2015-UBC-Letter-COMPLETE.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4HMTMkS-Vo

The latest gun control push is spearheaded by ONLY ONE group, Gun Sense Vermont.
In 2013 and 2014, Gun Sense went all-out on its anti-gun agenda by supporting EVERY ONE of the SEVENTEEN gun control bills proposed in Montpelier without exception!), these included:

1. Banning the manufacture, possession, or transfer of semi-automatic firearms,
2. Banning the manufacture, possession, or transfer of ammunition magazines over 10 rounds,
3. Mandated “safe storage” of all firearms,
4. Mandated 48 hour waiting periods,
5. Mandated reporting of mental health records to the federal government,
6. Banning firearms on all properties owned by schools (anti-hunting),
7. Mandated confiscation of firearms from persons ACCUSED of domestic violence,
8. Mandating Vermont law enforcement to be required to enforce federal laws,
9. Mandated “safety training” (and licensing for concealed carry),
and EVERY one of the 5 proposed Burlington Charter Changes, including:
10. An “assault weapon” and “high capacity” magazine ban,
11. Mandated license to carry concealed firearms,
12. Confiscation of firearms without adjudication on “reasonable suspicion” of domestic violence,
13. Ban on any property owned or leased by establishments with a liquor license,
14. Mandatory storage requirements for all firearms.

Now, Gun Sense says the ONLY thing they want in 2015 is Universal Background Checks?
Something is seriously wrong with this picture!

How can the same small group of people who led an outright assault on Article 16 in Vermont in 2014, suddenly change their song and say the “only” thing they want is background checks?

The core beliefs of these people have not changed, they still want to ban guns. They just want to go about it in a different manner since their last attempt was stopped cold in its tracks.

All Federal Firearms License (FFL) holders (dealers) are regulated and licensed by the federal government; therefore they need to adhere to federal law due to the nature of interstate commerce.

Whereas a sale, gift, trade or loan between two individuals in the state of Vermont is not under regulation of the federal government, nor is it illegal by Vermont Statute.

It is already illegal under federal law to sell a firearm to someone who resides in another state without going through an FFL dealer who conducts a background check.
It is already illegal under federal law to sell a firearm to a prohibited person.

[doetracks]

The Gun Owners of Vermont, GunSenseVT Exposed & the Vermont Citizens Defense League have assembled this short video to explain the problem with Universal Background Checks that are being proposed in Vermont and pushed by ONE group with out-of-state funding. (Anti-gun Bloomberg coalition).....

It is already illegal under federal law to sell a firearm to someone who resides in another state without going through an FFL dealer who conducts a background check.
It is already illegal under federal law to sell a firearm to a prohibited person.

Nicely done!! :happy0034:

[ex811]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpUsGyNfEfc

I like these better...

[expmler]

I believe it is in the best interest of every gun-owner, to be pro-active and try to weed out those who should not have firearms. It kinda makes the whole "PAL" system better, in that you don't have to wait to be approved after the purchase, but are in actuality, pre-approved going into a sale.
This mandate reflects that it is the person behind the trigger, not the gun, that kills people, and if we are in favor of policing our own, who can argue against the right to own firearms?

So if PALs reflect that it is the person behind the trigger, not the gun, that kills people. Why the restrictions on handguns and ARs?

[oldgutpile]

^^

Politics. Plain and simple.
Everyone got watching too many gangster movies, and now associate all handguns as bad. And, we all know those AR's should only be used and possessed by the military!