what do you really wish you could own but can't in Canada?

[Flieguy]

I'd love an unpinned P90 as well as a Walther PPK.

That belt fed conversion 9mm AR would also be sweeeeeeeeet

[couleefolk]

An army tank able to shoot live rounds. That would literally be a blast.

[honda610]

Ak47, AA12, incendiary rounds and suppressors.
The list could go on but that's my short list.

[double gun]

A blow gun, throwing star or nunchucks... all prohibited in Canada. :sHa_sarcasticlol:

[bobtodrick]

Portable personnel nuclear weapon.

[260 Rem]

25 shot Butler Creek mag to fit a 10/22 ....or a real Ruger BX - 25

[Lefty]

Silencers. With health and safety and noise pollution what it is in today's world they only make sense. Helps one keep their hearing, and one of the major complaints from people by ranges is the noise. Possibly shouldn't be allowed for hunting, but should be for just regular shooting.

[Dick284]

Bren Mk II.

[Grizzly Adams]

A blow gun, throwing star or nunchucks... all prohibited in Canada. :sHa_sarcasticlol:

Careful who sees your kid with a bean shooter. :lol:

Mg 42, but ammo costs would be a problem. :D

Grizz

[Smokinyotes]

I would be happy just to be able to take my AR coyote hunting with a 30 rd mag.

[Okotokian]

nevermind.

If this were in the "general" section I'd have a different answer. ;)

[GeoTrekr]

Ex-calgary Police service revolver would be pretty sweet.

In general though, a simple answer is anything we're not allowed to have.

[Bub]

Definitely AK47 just because.

[Dubious]

American streaming services and flavoured chewing tobacco. Some of that cheap cheese and cherry coke/lemon Fanta would be sweet I could call you all on one of them cheap American cell phone plans and tell you all about it if we could have those as well.

I would also settle for a MG-42

[3blade]

AR15
Glock 19
Sound moderators

I know the top two are available in modified form, but I'm not interested in playing their stupid games.

[MrSharp]

Suppressors, unpinned magazines, and short barrel hand guns.

And well since we are dreaming and all, a RPG would make a nice stocking stuffer.

If I had to pick one it would be suppressors, they would go good with my hard hat and steel toe boots, you know common sense PPE.

[Newview01]

A-10, comes with necessary training, and unlimited ammo.

Just to take care of some business.

[dewalt18]

The right to defend myself and my property.

[HuntinGuy]

A small in size, and lightweight, but large caliber handgun for protection while fly fishing/bow hunting. Rifles work but are large, slow, heavy and unpractical. I'd be happy to do extra background checks and stupid amounts of money for an extra license.
People own them in Canada for ranges so why is is different for citizens to use them for self defence in the wild? I spend top dollar for lightweight bows but have to pack a heavy ass shotgun...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[cschache]

A-10, comes with necessary training, and unlimited ammo.

Just to take care of some business.

X2
and a back packable mini gun and an M32

[Junglefisher]

Laser rifle.

[J0HN_R1]

I'd love an unpinned P90 as well as a Walther PPK.

That belt fed conversion 9mm AR would also be sweeeeeeeeet

The 2 bold guns are currently available here, albeit with modifications from OEM.

Last month I could have bought a NIB original 1976 Walther PPK (12.6) for $1,000 plus the $200 cost for E. Epps to change the barrel to a 106mm barrel and transfer it to me.

As for the P90, yeah it's not full-auto & the mags are pinned but... Even in the US, not every Joe-blow has the "tax-stamp" required to buy a full-auto. And We just get to practice mag-changes more often !


We just need the laws to change back to what they used to be, pre-bill C51 before Turdeau Sr. ruined firearm ownership in Canada. When the Liberal Party is in power (Turd Sr. / Cretien), we lose gun rights...

:(

[Nyksta]

A small in size, and lightweight, but large caliber handgun for protection while fly fishing/bow hunting. Rifles work but are large, slow, heavy and unpractical. I'd be happy to do extra background checks and stupid amounts of money for an extra license.
People own them in Canada for ranges so why is is different for citizens to use them for self defence in the wild? I spend top dollar for lightweight bows but have to pack a heavy ass shotgun...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

x2

[SylverCANADA]

Brothel :snapoutofit:

[TargetRick]

Quite like the old Savage 1907 semi-automatic pistols. But short barrel and .32 caliber, two strikes against it. Something to dream about.

[calgarychef]

A derringer and or a hammerless stubby revolver for in my pocket. Also a sound moderator for the rifle while shooting at the range.

[338 Rules]

I would love, love, love to own a Thompson Sub-Machine Gun!

Would be a blast to go to a range with a bottle of Jim Beam with a Tommy :)

http://i.imgur.com/8CqSi4mh.jpg

[bat119]

A mini gun



Some good old boy fun. beats the heck out if shooting gophers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLNoYujxeRo

[YoteStopper]

HK G36C, MP5 , some of the other HK's.

This about sums it up!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NptgWS2jVbU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxF7IJmFWkE

[Tactical Lever]

A blow gun, throwing star or nunchucks... all prohibited in Canada. :sHa_sarcasticlol:

Let's not forget handheld "pistol" crossbows, brass knuckles and balasong.

I guess most of it keeps us safe from the roving gangs of ninjas that used to roam the streets... :budo:

The list is long, and I would like an FA or 2, one in .22 LR, and another in a pistol cartridge, or maybe 30 carbine.

Suppressors. Some handier pistols like the Gunblast reviewed Bearcat converted to .327 Federal.

Also some liberal slaves, and responsible government Canada wide.

[deChelca]

An M1A would be awesome!
An MG42
Suppressors
Unpinned magazines

A GOVERNMENT THAT RECOGNIZES WE ARE NOT CRIMINALS!

[bigbaddad]

True personal freedom.... I know... Crazy, right?

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

[Redneck Hippy]

M224 60mm mortar with HE rounds? Would it technically be enough gun for moose? Please give me your opinions

[wolf308]

Oh man. Not sure which single one but .....

Real assault rifle( means full auto capable ) prolly an ar-15, and or stg 44

Dragunov sniper rifle , tommy gun , mg 42 or bren gun with the mag on top ,

Snub 38 special stainless. Oh and that bad boy shotgun French spasi 12 or something that's pump or semi .... u know the terminator ripped up the cops in 1984 shotgun.

[Twisted Canuck]

Any revolver or handgun with a 4" barrel. I know, just the thought of it caused 3 kittens to die, and a nun to faint during mass. Seems entirely ridiculous that my 4.2" GP 100 is restricted, but God forbid I might like to have a 4" Python, or S&W 27-2, or whatever. Really, even a snub would be nice in 2", but I don't want to push my luck here:scared:....but is that extra .2" really the difference between acceptable to own and take to the range and Oh Too Scary and Deadly to be Considered!? Stupidity.

[CaberTosser]

A-10, comes with necessary training, and unlimited ammo.

Just to take care of some business.

You and I could swap for variety, I'd lend you my AH-64 Apache in exchange. Then again seeing as this is purely theoretical it might as well be a Comanche.

My more reasonable requests would be legal CCW and no barrel length, cartridge or other restrictions on firearms. Just keep licensing so it's the sane and law-abiding who are carrying. Sound moderators would be heavily discounted through government rebates funded by the carbon tax in order to minimize noise pollution.

I also really want a few left hand drive Toyota Landcruisers, in various configurations. A pickup, a troop carrier and a standard 'ute'.

A few Euro model cars too, an Audi RS6 Avant, one of the new model Scirocco's that North America doesn't get and I'm sure there would be more.

[Unregistered user]

I would just like to see an end to such horse-whack as firearms classifications. So we could own and carry whatever we wanted.

[Tactical Lever]

Any revolver or handgun with a 4" barrel. I know, just the thought of it caused 3 kittens to die, and a nun to faint during mass. Seems entirely ridiculous that my 4.2" GP 100 is restricted, but God forbid I might like to have a 4" Python, or S&W 27-2, or whatever. Really, even a snub would be nice in 2", but I don't want to push my luck here:scared:....but is that extra .2" really the difference between acceptable to own and take to the range and Oh Too Scary and Deadly to be Considered!? Stupidity.

I always thought one of those 5 shot Rossi .44 Spl. were pretty neat. They had a 3" bbl. and a solid cylinder (some years?). I believe it was the model 720, and it appeared to me, probably the most perfect general purpose packing pistol.

[The_Gun_Boy]

Quite like the old Savage 1907 semi-automatic pistols. But short barrel and .32 caliber, two strikes against it. Something to dream about.

^^^^^^^^^^This^^^^^^^^^

[Twobucks]

I'd like a suppressor and the ability to carry a .22 pistol for popping rabbits and grouse in the backcountry.

Oh, and ninja stars. Always wanted some fudging ninja stars!

[wildbill]

Gatling gun like Jesse the body Ventura had in predator

[heretohunt]

25 shot butler creek steel lips magazine for my 10-.22:thinking-006:

[runnin'wild]

The right to defend myself and my property.

My thoughts exactly

[KegRiver]

I would like a fully automatic sling shot, but they aren't legal in Canada.

[gitrdun]

A conservative PM with a desire to make Canada great again.

[Grizzly Adams]

A conservative PM with a desire to make Canada great again.

Good luck with that one, think we're stuck with Trudeaus and Trumps for the foreseeable future. Not an intelligent soul to be seen on the horizon.

Grizz

[LongBomber]

1. Ability to hunt with and to pack a handgun in the bush, then I would buy a decent wheel gun.
2. Supressor - traditional guys hate them, but I like quiet.
3. Full auto of some kind - vegas was the best $750 for 20 min I ever spent...
4. Over 10round mags for a ruger 10/22- I don't have a 10/22 but I might buy one if it had a 150 drum mag... ok not really but a 25 shot butler creek sure seems handy when the gophers are out.
5. Some cool surplus army truck, maybe one of the newer 8 wheel rigs turned to a hunting camper.

[Waterfowler vmax]

Stand your ground laws and "shall issue" ccw or open carry permits

[Ursus_Major]

I'd be happy if I could get a suppressor, just for my .22 or .22 WMR.
Nothing more.

[jdf96ca]

hey guys im new to the site just curios if some one would be able to help me post my add.

[jdf96ca]

I wish we would be allowed to use suppressors/silencers our hear would just be a blast for the wolf and cyoty hunting.

[wolf308]

hey guys im new to the site just curios if some one would be able to help me post my add.

Prolly talk to moderators first of all for permission. Idk

[heybert]

I would like to have a nice TRW M-14 with full auto capabilities. I was a stupid youth and bought a comic book instead of one of the converted autos from Lever Arms back in the day, so never got my 12-3. Oh well, picked up a couple of nib S&W prohibs (12-6) because I can.

[antmai]

Suppressors to protect my ears and to increase the safety of those around the shooter(comms). Also decreases the sounds of a firearm being discharged close to private property.
The legal ability to shoot my two dream rifles: cz bren 805/806, fn scar.
The governmental common sense to be able to carry(while out hunting/shooting) a pistol. Can buy my 2000m+ effective range rifle after a day course but not a pistol after a more intensive 2 day course!
The awarding of any benefits to real soldiers who defend our country and freedom instead of a $10.5mil reward to a combatant against Canada and our allies.
Oh i have more, but baby steps!

[270person]

A missile launcher on the front of my truck. Failing that a bazooka.

For the commute to and from work.

[Newview01]

A missile launcher on the front of my truck. Failing that a bazooka.

For the commute to and from work.

This would make the start to my days a lot more relaxing.

[trooper]

How about a new conservative prime minister? Not to own but just to have in ottawa? One that is gun friendly? and loves to shoot guns???

[Delavan]

A G3, AK 47/74 semi, relaxed mag cap regs.

[gmtinker]

Nothing really crazy, just a real SVD, or even a Tigr (civilian version). Really, it's a semi-auto hunting rifle. I enjoy Russian rifles :)

[Groundhogger]

In order of things I'd actually buy/use in the first year?

1. AR-15 **NON-RESTRICTED** so I could varmint hunt with it
2. .22LR pistols **NON-RESTRICTED** so I could shoot them on the farm
3. Suppressor(s)
______________________________________

When the bank account recovered and/or I won the lottery..

4. De Lisle Carbine
5. American 180, full-auto .22

[JDK71]

The right to defend myself and my property.

that makes two of us

[^v^Tinda wolf^v^]

I wouldn't mind a rocket launcher.

[Patchrat]

I just want to conceal carry a suppressed AR pistol to protect my legal weed crops......

Too far? :)

[BuckCuller]

Freedom to offend without persecution.

[markg]

I want a suppressor and a Time machine to go back about 3 months ago.

[Five]

Proper magazine capacities. Suppressors.

[Newview01]

80% lowers

[p3t3rsn]

My friends beautiful prohibited stubby Colt

[odsixer]

Suppresors would be nice!

[J_mcrane]

Any handgun under "4"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Belus]

Just like it was mentioned before:
- The right to protect myself and my property.
- All the Firearms and accessories that are prohibited.
Do I really want too much?
I don't think so.

[dantheman93]

to be able to carry a handgun in the bush for self defense.

larger clip capacity on shotguns

and above all else some good ol captain black golds :bad_boys_20:

[mckenzieclan]

The Death Star,...

[HappyHunter9]

The right to defend myself and my property.


The Criminal Code of Canada indeed gives you these rights:

Defence of person: section 34

Defence of propery: section 35




SELF DEFENCE

34 (1) A person is not guilty of an offence if

(a) they believe on reasonable grounds that force is being used against them or another person or that a threat of force is being made against them or another person;

(b) the act that constitutes the offence is committed for the purpose of defending or protecting themselves or the other person from that use or threat of force; and

(c) the act committed is reasonable in the circumstances.

Factors

(2) In determining whether the act committed is reasonable in the circumstances, the court shall consider the relevant circumstances of the person, the other parties and the act, including, but not limited to, the following factors:

(a) the nature of the force or threat;

(b) the extent to which the use of force was imminent and whether there were other means available to respond to the potential use of force;

(c) the person’s role in the incident;

(d) whether any party to the incident used or threatened to use a weapon;

(e) the size, age, gender and physical capabilities of the parties to the incident;

(f) the nature, duration and history of any relationship between the parties to the incident, including any prior use or threat of force and the nature of that force or threat;

(f.1) any history of interaction or communication between the parties to the incident;

(g) the nature and proportionality of the person’s response to the use or threat of force; and

(h) whether the act committed was in response to a use or threat of force that the person knew was lawful.

No defence

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if the force is used or threatened by another person for the purpose of doing something that they are required or authorized by law to do in the administration or enforcement of the law, unless the person who commits the act that constitutes the offence believes on reasonable grounds that the other person is acting unlawfully.


DEFENCE OF PROPERTY
Defence — property

35 (1) A person is not guilty of an offence if

(a) they either believe on reasonable grounds that they are in peaceable possession of property or are acting under the authority of, or lawfully assisting, a person whom they believe on reasonable grounds is in peaceable possession of property;

(b) they believe on reasonable grounds that another person

(i) is about to enter, is entering or has entered the property without being entitled by law to do so,

(ii) is about to take the property, is doing so or has just done so, or

(iii) is about to damage or destroy the property, or make it inoperative, or is doing so;

(c) the act that constitutes the offence is committed for the purpose of

(i) preventing the other person from entering the property, or removing that person from the property, or

(ii) preventing the other person from taking, damaging or destroying the property or from making it inoperative, or retaking the property from that person; and

(d) the act committed is reasonable in the circumstances.

No defence

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the person who believes on reasonable grounds that they are, or who is believed on reasonable grounds to be, in peaceable possession of the property does not have a claim of right to it and the other person is entitled to its possession by law.

No defence

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if the other person is doing something that they are required or authorized by law to do in the administration or enforcement of the law, unless the person who commits the act that constitutes the offence believes on reasonable grounds that the other person is acting unlawfully.