Need help deciding on which scope to get

[Ldsh_tanker]

its going on a 6.5 CM for hunting and playing around.
Swaro z3- 4-12x50 or vortex hd LH 3-15x42?

What and why

[Ldsh_tanker]

further it will be 90% used for hunting and occasionally playing around at range.

[Okotokian]

I'd take the Swaro. Brighter and lighter. 50mm objective lens and yet an ounce lighter.

[RobTurbo]

I'd take the Swaro. Brighter and lighter. 50mm and an ounce lighter.

This!

[Ldsh_tanker]

only trade off really is that swaro doesn't have the warranty that vortex has.

[Okotokian]

only trade off really is that swaro doesn't have the warranty that vortex has.

Then might as well get a Bushnell. They'll apparently give you a new scope if your kid throws your scope in the fire. :) Warranty is a good thing for sure, but I wouldn't choose a product that, except for warranty, I thought to be otherwise inferior.

Does Vortex make a 50mm in that scope so you would at least be comparing apples to apples? I've always been fine with 40 or 42mm scopes as I wanted a lighter scope, but if you are looking at a 50 that is lighter than the 42 you are considering, it seems like a no brainer (assuming quality is otherwise equal).

[Ldsh_tanker]

I can get a 42mm for the z3
Ya good point about the warranty part. It just gives me a better warm fuzzy feeling knowing my 1000+ dollar scope is covered for piece of mind. But your right the quality from swaro is second to none.

[Beeman3]

Depending how far you plan to shoot I'd look at the Z5 5-25x52 as well.

[Peebles]

only trade off really is that swaro doesn't have the warranty that vortex has.

But no matter how many times you return the Vortex it will never be as good as the Swarovski.

[Ldsh_tanker]

cant afford the z5, or else id be all over her lol

[Kurt505]

I would pick the Z3for the quality and weight. With the Swarovski you won't have to worry about the warranty. When I sent in my EL's to have the diopter fixed, not only was it free but they sent it back with a free set of lens caps.

[Dick284]

Nikon Monarch 4-16x42 nikoplex reticle!

[gitrdun]

Having used and owning a few Vortex optics, I simply cannot wrap my head around the negativity. I personally don't own a Swaro scope, but I've had experience with those of my clients. As far as I'm concerned, the reticle looks as though it was drawn in with a crayon. They also seem to lack sub-tension. Vortex optics as of yet have never failed me, they are clear enough for what I do. They have ample sub-tension. And most importantly, when I dial in a quarter MOA, they yield exactly as dialed in. True, they are not a Swaro, but they seem to work for me at least. I don't like busy reticles with all of the hash marks, dots and all that jazz. I prefer to hold over or dial in with a fine crosshair and a target dot.

[nube]

I've never used a Vortex but I would pick Swaro for sure. I love every one I got

[209x50]

But no matter how many times you return the Vortex it will never be as good as the Swarovski.

Exactly and I have never heard of anyone left hanging by Swaro on any problem.

[Ldsh_tanker]

well tried out a mark v setup with the swaro and I cannot get enough eye relief. I'm really upset by this but what can you do. Looked at all the options for mounts and nothing will bring it closer for me.

So back at the drawing boards once again.
Zeiss conquest hd5 in 5x25x50 with r z 800 reticle.

Thoughts?

[Maxwell78]

well tried out a mark v setup with the swaro and I cannot get enough eye relief. I'm really upset by this but what can you do. Looked at all the options for mounts and nothing will bring it closer for me.

So back at the drawing boards once again.
Zeiss conquest hd5 in 5x25x50 with r z 800 reticle.

Thoughts?



The 5-25's are heavy. the z800 reticle seems too busy

i have a couple of 3-15 with the r600 reticle and they are way lighter and less busy

Just my thoughts

[gitrdun]

If a scope does not come with very fine crosshair reticle and a target dot, I don't want it, particularly when it comes to target shooting. :)

[J0HN_R1]

But no matter how many times you return the Vortex it will never be as good as the Swarovski.

And no matter how many times it malfunctions or you accidentally damage your Swaro, you'll never get a free replacement. Ever.

Kiss your $1200 goodbye... :sHa_sarcasticlol:

[qwert]

And no matter how many times it malfunctions or you accidentally damage your Swaro, you'll never get a free replacement. Ever.

Kiss your $1200 goodbye... :sHa_sarcasticlol:

I purchase Swarovski, Leica, S&B and other 'investment quality' Alpha glass
because of its superb optical performance and quality control, neither is inexpensive.

AFAIK, a major factor in the cost of Alpha glass is the high rejection rate in QC.
(This rejected glass is not destroyed, it is sold for use by less demanding brands and users.)

The cost of providing idiots with a free scope because they drove over it with a vehicle,
is also not an inexpensive cost that is paid by all Vortex purchasers, (as an alternative to QC).

Swarovski service is very good but not unlimited.
I have MANY reports of outstanding and VERY inexpensive service on old and damaged Swarovski products.
I have NEVER heard any reports of Swarovski repairs (or warranty replacements) failing soon after return (like Vortex)
or of multiple returns (like Vortex) that were not repaired or replaced properly.
Many Vortex users seem to spend a lot of energy bragging about their products that have failed,
few Alpha glass owners have any warranty experience.

Good Luck, YMMV.

[gtr]

well tried out a mark v setup with the swaro and I cannot get enough eye relief. I'm really upset by this but what can you do. Looked at all the options for mounts and nothing will bring it closer for me.

So back at the drawing boards once again.
Zeiss conquest hd5 in 5x25x50 with r z 800 reticle.

Thoughts?

I checked out the VX5HD Leupold scopes on the weekend. For my money, and eyes they are my pick. Might be something for you to check out for yourself.:)

[209x50]

well tried out a mark v setup with the swaro and I cannot get enough eye relief. I'm really upset by this but what can you do. Looked at all the options for mounts and nothing will bring it closer for me.

So back at the drawing boards once again.
Zeiss conquest hd5 in 5x25x50 with r z 800 reticle.

Thoughts?

I have several HD5 with the Rapid Z 800. For me it is the fastest slickest hunting reticle out there. 3 of the HD5 are the 5-25 but I prefer the 3-15 and have far more of that the higher magnification model.

[209x50]

I purchase Swarovski, Leica, S&B and other 'investment quality' Alpha glass
because of its superb optical performance and quality control, neither is inexpensive.

AFAIK, a major factor in the cost of Alpha glass is the high rejection rate in QC.
(This rejected glass is not destroyed, it is sold for use by less demanding brands and users.)

The cost of providing idiots with a free scope because they drove over it with a vehicle,
is also not an inexpensive cost that is paid by all Vortex purchasers, (as an alternative to QC).

Swarovski service is very good but not unlimited.
I have MANY reports of outstanding and VERY inexpensive service on old and damaged Swarovski products.
I have NEVER heard any reports of Swarovski repairs (or warranty replacements) failing soon after return (like Vortex)
or of multiple returns (like Vortex) that were not repaired or replaced properly.
Many Vortex users seem to spend a lot of energy bragging about their products that have failed,
few Alpha glass owners have any warranty experience.

Good Luck, YMMV.

I know a gentleman from Swaro. He is way up the food chain. He has a great collection of pictures of scopes they have fixed for free that had nothing to do with warranty. pictures of bent tubes from quad roll overs, free fall down mountains even a cool horseshoe imprint. All the top Euro glass companies have pictures like that and they are pretty proud of where their optic go and what they endure. I would never be afraid of buying an optic made by Zeiss, Swaro or Leica.

[rwalker]

I personally like 40 (ish) mm over a 50 (ish) mm just for how high the scope is mounted.

[Diesel_wiesel]

high end burris or schmidt & bender with 50mm lense
is the only way I would go

[stc77]

Check out the Leupold Vx6 or the new VX6HD. I love my VX6 and would recommend it to anybody.

[morinj]

Check out the Leupold Vx6 or the new VX6HD. I love my VX6 and would recommend it to anybody.

X2, the vx3i is very nice aswell!

[7 REM MAG]

I've never looked through a vortex scope that I've liked. They all seem to have a super busy, convuluted reticle that's not needed on a hunting gun.

As far as warranty goes why purchase something of that price level because it has lifetime warranty? Are you counting on it breaking down? And if so why not purchase something that can be repaired in Alberta like a leupold? I've got Zeiss, Leica, and swaro scopes on my hunting rifles and the Leica and swaro are by far the best scopes I've used. Definitely money well spent