![]() |
No it's not one small example, it is a big one
|
Quote:
and i can show you where livestock have completely destroyed the riparian zone and spawn beds in streams and creeks. Where is the outcry about that? what is the plan to mitigate that? |
Quote:
What caught my eye is that even the Alpine Club of Canada (which is in heavy support of conservation, leave no trace, etc.) is concerned about what this will mean. If those guys are worried, then I'm definitely worried. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
yet there is a large coal mine that is going in along the north ram river
just to the north of where the south and north ram rivers meet with a massive conveyor belt that will go right over the ram river valley |
Quote:
http://aohva.com/ https://www.facebook.com/Alberta-Off...2048513495867/ Like and share these links Cal |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hi Don, Tried to send a pm... Can you expand on this? Provide any documentation? Thanks, Dale |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hunters and anglers USED to be the first who promoted conservation. Reading many of the comments and threads on here, I'm not so sure that is the case any more. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Frankly I don't care what your response is, I'm just laughing at your cherry-picking logic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I just hate the close it down and turn it into a park reaction. |
Quote:
As does the selective application of the term conservation to fit each person's personal agenda. Poaching wildlife is OK, because it's better than OHVs causing erosion. Huh?????? I'll be the first one to agree that the OHV community needs to get it's act together and educate and self regulate, but unfortunately, it is NOT up to us, we don't have the power to enforce the laws, and that is the single most critical factor in having responsible and sustainable OHV use. So simple, but unfortunately, so is banning things, and banning things is "free". Banning things also works better when combined with selective logic and conservation a la carte... |
Quote:
released this morning http://www.rmoutlook.com/article/Min...ndary-20171207 |
Quote:
BEARS in Canmore residential neighborhoods???!!!! Say it ain't so.....damn bowhunters:sign0161: |
Quote:
I don't think that is what Don is talking about. This Larch Island incident is new. Previous Land use planning groups have called for eliminating hunting in other areas of the Bow Corridor, such as behind Harvey Heights. Maybe Don knows of other areas being targeted for hunting closures. Would be good to know. |
Quote:
You know it is a reality. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Are we conservationists or not? Do we care about the best minimal impact on sensitive areas or not? The answers to those questions will determine our perspective. However, the answer to those questions will also have other authorities determine what happens. It's best to work with them, rather than use the "the heck with them, we are right" perspective. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
just another horse guy that's pizzed off that quads can access a minimal amount of the back country (compared to what atvs are allowed to access) that should be only for him and his horse buddies.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And no, one must NOT be riding an OHV to get back there. Walking has worked for millions of years. Riding horses for thousand of years. How can our perspective be so skewed that the only way on thinks one can traverse wilderness is by motor? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.