Leupold VX3 B&C vs Zeiss Conquest Rapid Z
Iam looking for a good holdover scope for my 7mmSTW. Looking for experiences with or opinions on the Leupold VX3 4.5-14X50 B&C reticle and the Zeiss Conquest 4.5-14x50 rapid Z 600 or 800. Appreciate any input you may have. Any other options I may want to look at are welcome aswell. Thanks
|
I have a 7mmSTW on the way myself, and unless you download your ammunition, or use bullets with a poor BC, neither of those options works well with the trajectory of the 7mmSTW.
|
If you bump your zero to around 225 yards it will put you awfully close with the Rapid Z 800....depending on your load of close.
|
Bumping the zero to more than 200 yards made it even worse. Reducing the zero to around 170 yards got me the closest, but the only way to get good results was to drop the velocity by about 200fps, or drop the velocity by around 100fps, and drop the BC by about .07.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thanks for the info guys. I was kind of partial to the Zeiss as by looking at there online calculator you can input your load and it will do the work for you, has anyone used this calculator to determine the holdover points? Maybe a turret scope is best for the STW.
|
Quote:
|
With my 139/140gr load(GMX or Accubond), I had to drop the velocity to 3275fps to make the numbers work well, and with my 160gr load(Accubond) I had to drop the velocity to 3150fps. Both would be very mild 7mmstw loads. Using my normal velocity 7mmstw loads, I had to go with a zero of around 150 yards, which made the point of impact low at 300 to 500 yards, and it was still high from 600 to 800 yards. I went with a Swarovski Z5 3.5-18x44 myself, as the BRH hashmarks worked out better with my loads.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seems like a lot of work, might want to look into the CDS. |
Quote:
Hash Marks---- Actual zero 300----------- 287 400---------- 400 500---------- 510 600 ---------- 620 700---------- 731 800---------- 840 Those 600,700, and 800 yard hash marks aren't close enough for me. A difference of 40 yards at 800 yards is way too much. Even 31 yards at 700 yards is too much for hunting. |
A turret would be a better option in this case.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.