An antlered antlerless
This year I shot a deer with messed up antlers. He was missing one on one side, and the other side traced along the line of his jaw. I thought he was a big doe, and because I had both antlered and antlerless, I bagged him.
I tagged him as antlered, because the length of the tine was about 15cm. Was that the right tag to use? |
If it had a 15cm antler, the deer was antlered by definition, so an antlered tag is required. But this does remind me of a banned AO member that thought i was okay to use an antlerless tag, because he didn't see the antler.:)
|
Quote:
I figured I should do my best to be technically correct. |
I think the regs would come in handy
|
Quote:
I guess it's a stupid question, but it's been on my mind so I thought I'd ask. |
Sounds like a cool looking deer, any chance of a picture?
|
Definitely the right tag, 4” isn’t very much. Like you mentioned regardless if it grows up out or down, 4” is 4”.
LC |
Quote:
That’s how he read the BC regulations! So he must be right :) LC |
It sucks but you did the right thing. Here’s a doe I shot back in 2010 that had a weird antler. It would’ve sucked as well if I had to use my general but it wasn’t longer than 4”
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...9c8fcfc9ae.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ya, it was sort of like that, except longer and no velvet. |
You shoot deer based on what is on its head, not what is between it legs. That is why it is asinine to tag a deer on the leg.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Must be a hybrid :bad_boys_20:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.