Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum
Page 1 of 3 1 23
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Alberta Outdoorsmen Forum (http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Supreme Court to Rule on President Trump's Travel Ban Today (http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?t=323439)

338 Rules 06-12-2017 06:48 AM
Supreme Court to Rule on President Trump's Travel Ban Today
 
Apparently the Supreme Court is going to Rule on President Trump's Travel Ban Today.

Anyone want to bet that they will overturn the lower court's or should I say the Liberal court's injunction?

DiabeticKripple 06-12-2017 07:55 AM
Wouldn't that be awesome.

The president should be able to say who can, and cannot come into their country

338 Rules 06-12-2017 08:13 AM
Sure would. I expect it because under the Constitution the President has full desecration in making that decision. :)

wags 06-12-2017 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561359)
Apparently the Supreme Court is going to Rule on President Trump's Travel Ban Today.

Anyone want to bet that they will overturn the lower court's or should I say the Liberal court's injunction?
Just because I enjoy you so much - i'll take that bet! :)

Cheers

338 Rules 06-12-2017 09:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags (Post 3561464)
Just because I enjoy you so much - i'll take that bet! :)

Cheers
How much? $100.00 I like you too wags so I know you will honor your bet, as I will! :sHa_shakeshout:

wags 06-12-2017 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561471)
How much? $100.00 I like you too wags so I know you will honor your bet, as I will! :sHa_shakeshout:
Where do you live? I think a meal would be good.

Cheers

wags 06-12-2017 10:36 AM
An accord has been reached.

wags 06-12-2017 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags (Post 3561508)
An accord has been reached.
Should be a fun lunch! :)

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...-court-n771091

Bub 06-12-2017 11:55 AM
Lol. And lol is lightly said :lol:

Would take the bet if I read this earlier.

Bub 06-12-2017 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiabeticKripple (Post 3561399)
The president should be able to say who can, and cannot come into their country
I believe that would be the case in monarchy/dictatorship/etc. Civilized world does not run this way.

Okotokian 06-12-2017 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561411)
President has full desecration in making that decision. :)
Hilariously, mistakenly, a gem of a description. LOL

From Wikipedia:
Desecration is the act of depriving something of its sacred character, or the disrespectful, contemptuous, or destructive treatment of that which is held to be sacred or holy by a group or individual.

Yup, that's Donald. ;)

rugatika 06-12-2017 12:17 PM
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...ysis-not-legal
Quote:
When Willie Sutton was once asked “why do you pick banks to rob,” he replied “because that’s where the money is.” Not all the money, but enough of it to prioritize banks. Similarly, when asked why these six countries were prioritized, the Trump administration responds, “because that’s where the terrorists are,” — not all of them but these countries aren’t vetting them properly.

The inclusion of the six Islamic countries in the travel ban is rational. It may not be the best list. Perhaps there should be no country list at all. But that is a judgement allocated by Congress and the Constitution to the executive branch. It is subject, of course, to the constraints of the Constitution. But the judicial branch will generally defer to the executive branch on matters involving national security, unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution.

In my opinion, that high threshold has not been reached in this case. So I predict the Supreme Court, if it gets the case, will find the new executive order constitutional.

elkhunter11 06-12-2017 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub (Post 3561574)
I believe that would be the case in monarchy/dictatorship/etc. Civilized world does not run this way.
Except monarchs/dictators are not usually elected to lead their country.

338 Rules 06-12-2017 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub (Post 3561565)
Lol. And lol is lightly said :lol:

Would take the bet if I read this earlier.
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??

rugatika 06-12-2017 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561584)
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??
They are confusing the VERY liberal 9th circuit for the Supreme Court.

stringer 06-12-2017 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags (Post 3561562)
Did he not state the Supreme Court ? Your link is to a federal appeals court ruling :thinking-006:

wags 06-12-2017 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561584)
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??
My bad, I just saw the headline - we shall continue to wait.

wags 06-12-2017 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rugatika (Post 3561586)
They are confusing the VERY liberal 9th circuit for the Supreme Court.
Yes of course, Liberal court - my bad.

wags 06-12-2017 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rugatika (Post 3561579)
Better ban Americans, that's who goes into school and shoots kids! :)

wags 06-12-2017 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stringer (Post 3561587)
Did he not state the Supreme Court ? Your link is to a federal appeals court ruling :thinking-006:
Yes he did Stringer. For once, you are correct :)

338 Rules 06-12-2017 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags (Post 3561591)
Yes of course, Liberal court - my bad.
wags, If I lose (which I highly doubt) anywhere but Tim Hortons ok? I heard their prices went up :sHa_sarcasticlol:

wags 06-12-2017 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561599)
wags, If I lose (which I highly doubt) anywhere but Tim Hortons ok? I heard their prices went up :sHa_sarcasticlol:
Oh I wouldn't eat at Timmie's when someone else is paying ;)

338 Rules 06-12-2017 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wags (Post 3561602)
Oh I wouldn't eat at Timmie's when someone else is paying ;)
I knew you had class!!!!

wags 06-12-2017 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561605)
I knew you had class!!!!
lol

Bub 06-12-2017 01:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561584)
Supreme Court has not ruled yet, am I missing something??
All I am saying is that it is funny that you think the ban will be put in place.

Is the ruling (by Supreme Court) even supposed to take place today?

338 Rules 06-12-2017 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub (Post 3561621)
All I am saying is that it is funny that you think the ban will be put in place.

Is the ruling (by Supreme Court) even supposed to take place today?
I heard the the Supreme Court was going to rush the hearing forward and would rule on it today, maybe I misunderstood???

Gray Wolf 06-12-2017 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 338 Rules (Post 3561624)
I heard the the Supreme Court was going to rush the hearing forward and would rule on it today, maybe I misunderstood???
You "misunderstood" Big Time!

Best check your facts, before you start a thread
.

338 Rules 06-12-2017 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gray Wolf (Post 3561627)
You "misunderstood" Big Time!

Best check your facts, before you start a thread
.
Maybe I am incorrect!

wags is the bet still on with the SC decision? I am partial to The Keg :)

Bub 06-12-2017 01:14 PM
No ruling today. Hence, whatever wag had posted is what I though you were talking about.
Quote:
Those opposed to President Trump's travel ban have until Monday afternoon to file responses to a petition filed with the Supreme Court, according to CNN.

Currently, justices are deciding whether they will take on the Trump Administration's appeal on his travel ban. As they do that, the Trump Administration is asking the Supreme Court to let his travel ban go into effect.

Monday's deadline comes about two weeks before the Supreme Courts' term is scheduled to end.

338 Rules 06-12-2017 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bub (Post 3561631)
No ruling today. Hence, whatever wag had posted is what I though you were talking about.

"Those opposed to President Trump's travel ban have until Monday afternoon to file responses to a petition filed with the Supreme Court, according to CNN."
oh, my bad!

When it comes to CNN, I would not know what they are reporting, I refuse to watch Very Fake News!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 PM.
Page 1 of 3 1 23
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.