Grassy Mtn. Coal Project not dead yet.
Looks like The Australian owners of the Grassy Mtn. open pit coal mine in the Crowsnest Pass haven't given up the fight after having their application rejected repeatedly. Energy Minister Brian Jean has determined their proposal should be exempt from a moratorium on coal development on the eastern slopes which most Albertans supported, so their re-application will be reviewed by a panel of hearing commissioners, who will probably be well rewarded for making the "right" decision this time round.
https://calgaryherald.com/business/a...0b6359cd5/amp/ With severe draught conditions already acknowledged for the Oldman River watershed and most of Southern AB., can't understand how can they justify granting a huge water license to a project of this scale. Nevermind the massive amount of selenium pollution this project will dump into the environment. |
|
Quote:
|
If you want a perfect example of why the dippers remain viable, here it is
Jean is a loser who was rejected by Albertans twice. He had a temper tantrum and quit mid term. Came back and lost the leadership campaign, yet somehow ended up in a very visible position of power. Why? Old boys club at work. The mine is foreign owned, insanely destructive, was rejected by Albertans, and will provide an endless supply of narratives and photo-ops to attack conservatives, with no long term economic benefits that could ever outweigh the watershed risks and inevitable taxpayer funded clean up costs. Why? Someone in Dani’s circle got paid Australian dollars, without a doubt. Corruption, yet again. Not a dang thing learned from four years in the woodshed. |
In south west Alberta there is a ton of people working in sparwood BC coal mine because its only employer that pays anything. If that mine ever closed you could cowboy or farm if you had the skills but other than that nothing is going to really pay you a living wage.
There are a lot of small towns in SW Alberta that would be ghost towns if government ever quit propping them up. People keep moving here and no jobs for them. Lot don't even have a drivers license. I understand wanting jobs. But overstocked now with wrong type of people. Every person that moves here from Calgary or Africa means more water consumption which we dont have. I don't understand why people keep moving here because nothing for them. |
Quote:
I'd still like to see a mine on corkscrew like has been the talk for a long time as would a majority of the locals I suspect. Good for the economy and might even be big sheep living there in a few years when the operating company starts the reclamation (not sure why you believe it would be the taxpayers) |
Quote:
The royalties are currently only 1% of gross profit until capital payoff, then 13%, but the damage done and the scars left on the land will be eternal. There seems to be a huge disconnect about things that are important nowadays and things that are not, "blinded by the light"....and the light is money. |
Quote:
Alberta would be just another Manitoba if it wasn't for it's resources. Use em' Nimbyism is just a synonym for hypocrite |
Quote:
I understand the need for jobs for local people and I want them to have good jobs but we are currently being flooded already with basically some from Alberta but a lot from other countries and nothing here for them. If that mine opened up the immigration wave coming for these jobs will be huge and it will change area forever. And we don't have the water. Only one place they can get water and that's from the only industry that has always been here. Do we want to turn into southern Ontario although Ontario has endless amounts of water. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe they pay $45/hr. to drive water trucks... |
Quote:
Personally I don’t have enough information on the mine itself to make an educated stance so I am neither for or against it But sadly most don’t choose that approach and speak first |
As for jobs, if this coal mine gets approved this Australian company will run it lean and mean. A lot of the heavy equipment and trucks included will be robotic controlled. There is a company called EACON that already has mining trucks in service with no drivers. Totally controlled by robotics. Can work those trucks 24/7 and pretty much all though out the year excluding downtime for maintenance. Once these big multinational companies are finished turning the mountain into a moonscape it will be off to another country to rape and pillage their resources. When will Canadians ever learn.
|
Quote:
Now unless the technology has improved in the last 7 years the un man haul trucks do not react properly in mountain mines under winter conditions. This was why the 3 different companies I worked for would not use them. We actually had 3 brought in for testing on the one site and it didn’t go well in the winter Because I left the industry I no longer keep up to date with this but I know past technology for self driving haul trucks had limitations. They were far more suitable for the conditions you find in the Fort Mac oil sands and I know they still have not replaced manned trucks there even Definitely a future possibility but doesn’t seem to be common practice in the industry at least here in Canada |
Quote:
Selenium is released when waste rock from metallurgical coal mines comes into contact with air and water, creating a soluble form of selenium which is released and congregates in tributaries. Teck Coal Inc. was fined $60 million for releasing selenium into the Elk River system when their filtration system failed to work adequately and is being sued in US courts for pollution of Lake Koocanusa, a reservoir that crosses the international border and feeds rivers in Montana and Idaho. Pincher Creek spent just under $1 million last year to haul water due to low levels in the Oldman Reservoir caused by severe draught conditions. The reservoir is currently at 30% capacity and just recently it appears the Crowsnest River has run dry, heightening the immediate water crisis. https://calgaryherald.com/news/crows...bsurface-water I'd say that's 2 solid strikes against this project. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was not worried about her coal mining until I looked into affects of selenium on rivers in B.C. it’s been a disaster. If they could mine the coal without an open pit system… I would be less worried. They don’t have a mitigation/protection system in place and can’t control selenium in an open pit mine. I don’t want to lose foothills streams. We don’t have a lot of water in southern Alberta. |
Quote:
If this mining is lucrative, why hasn't a Canadian Company stepped up? I'd like to see a 2.5 billion dollar deposit that increases over 5 years time to 5 Billion dollars that would cover clean up, and reclamation of the site should the mine not reclaim it properly themselves. If everything is good at the end of the mine cycle and not contamination. Give them their money back. I'd also like to see bimonthly water testing at the expense of the mine owners to ensure headwaters and everything down stream remains clean. Allowing them to proceed without restriction and not protecting the province from a financial loss isn't good business when it comes to our resources and water supply. BW |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Exposing the rock to Mother Nature will create an unstoppable problem and leaching will go on. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know you are talking about different use of selenium but I'm wondering of its as dangerous as the environmental wacko crowd says it is? I'm not calling anyone here an environmental wacko but they do exist . Same wackoes against everything I have ever done for a living. Logging, gravel pits, hunting, farming, etc. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.