cattle rancher sentenced for 1.2m in stolen goods
http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local...farm-equipment
House arrest and a slap on the wrist. Guy blames his crappy upbringing and mental issues. He doesnt remember robbing any companies. He can't accept responsibility for his actions yet has no problems falling back on a mental illness as an excuss. Uh... okay. |
Seemed like a trivial sentence for the offences, to those of us nearby.
I hope that restitution to those that he stole from is significant. |
Huh, what...I did that...don't remember....and that about sums it up.
|
The wife seems somewhat complicit as well.
|
He has to pay back 1.1million, is that a slap on the wrist?
If he can stay working on his farm he is more likely to be able to do that, prison won't help anything on a farm he isn't going anywhere. He's going to stay in his community for the rest of his life and everyone is going to know who he is and to be careful doing business with him. Jail will only cost society more. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
There is always a reason lately that it wasn’t my fault.
Zero accountability these days |
Not only my neck of the woods people stealing round balers ,crazy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mis-read. But most of what he stole was returned. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
To quote the O.P. "Uh...okay"
Not to put too fine a point on it but it seems to me that 2 years of having the police show up any time of the day or night is hardly a slap on the wrist. Those guys will search under the mattress for stolen tractors and balers. After that portion of the sentence he will be required to visit the police once a week for three years. All the while attempting to come up with the 110K to satisfy the reimbursement phase plus defend himself in a civil suit which he will invariably lose, causing further financial hardship.
I'm not arguing that he doesn't deserve this treatment, but it is hardly a cakewalk as has been suggested here. Seems to me that his sentence matches entirely what a jail term would cause in his life, without the burden to the taxpayer nor the agony it creates amongst the masses. If you took the time to read the news story comprehensively then scrolled down the page to the comments from Facebook you would have seen that the conversation went immediately to a race-based tirade when this guy is just a common (Caucasian) thief. Free |
Quote:
How does a judge not throw the book at a guy for multiple robberies who pretends he doesn't remember multiple crimes. |
Quote:
Also I don't think house arrest gives someone the ability to search your house anytime anywhere.. there's zero info on conditions of house arrest. |
What would jail do?
Keep society safer? He stole farm equipment, yes it hurt those he stole from and now has to pay some back, WHILE he works and supports himself and his family. Jail? He sits and does nothing while taxpayers support him (at a resort hotel) and his family. The restitution isn't paid. I'm not against prison or even capital punishment, but most often only society pays a price. We pay more tax and the criminal gets worse. Now to those who insist he does jail time, explain how it has a better outcome? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
While I acknowledge the need for prisons, we need to think differently about how we deal repeat petty criminals because locking them up just isn't working. Unfortunately in Canada, we have our precious Charter of Rights and Freedoms which always grants more freedom to the individual and severely limits options when it comes to punishment for criminals. The Charter is a good idea in theory when coupled with a strong western/Judeo-Christian world view, but unfortunately when it is interpreted with the post-modern deconstructionist mindset of our left wing judicial system, it all falls apart. I think this judge's creative solution is a better approach than simply locking this criminal up since his overall risk, as it pertains to violence, seems pretty low. Whether or not the punishment works is more up to how thoroughly it is enforced by the police. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That would be a deterrent, which would make people think twice before stealing. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Here the honest bottom line from my perspective. I don't want to pay $120,000 a year for someone to be locked up for multiple years for non-violent property theft in which all the property was returned and the owners were reimbursed for losses. I doubt many on here do either.
The bigger issue I have with the system, is that it costs $120,00/year to keep someone incarcerated. I could probably do it for about half of that. Private jail, wonder if the government would go for it.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So I guess.
You all are saying it would be OK if I steal your property with next to nothing for recourse?
Everyone that thinks this is OK can you PM me your addresses and let me know when you will not be home. Don’t worry I’ll take good care of your stuff. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Boom! Headshot. /thread. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.