Quote:
|
Quote:
Further, it is just silly to not look at effectiveness and harvest rates per weapon - it just is. In any given year, as has been established, bowhunters province wide are taking LESS than 15% of all mule deer harvested in this province. That means that the "unfortunate" rifle hunters that you mention take approximately 7 deer for every 1 that a bowhunter takes. To ignore this or say that it should not be considered is just being stubborn and hard headed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
And if you could indicate anywhere that I even alluded to "having every rifle hunter buy a bow and sling arrows whether capable or not", I will literally lick your boots and allow you to take a picture to post on the forum. I'm clearly outmatched and outwitted by your sensational logical structure, I had best bow out.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
....and you calling a guy pathetic....wow that is just not very polite.... Quote:
LC |
Quote:
|
Red herring is an English-language idiom that commonly refers to a logical fallacy that misleads or detracts from the actual issue
Aka, this: "So how many general tags would have been sold if every rifle hunter went and bought a general mule tag? Wonder why you would want that. You obviously don't care about the animal, just as long as you don't miss out on a year of hunting one" A straw man or straw person, is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and to refute it, without ever having actually refuted the original position Aka, this: "Hope you have lots a crown land to hunt on because by telling rifle hunters to go buy a bow, whether capable of using it or not, and just start slinging arrows at deer" Oh, and an abusive ad hominem just for good measure: "Pathetic you are." Man, you are a logical and debating rockstar. And you wonder why you can never make any ground with people around here… So please, now that we are clear as to what my argument was, that being that lack of opportunity is not equivalent to willingly choosing to not engage in an opportunity, please tell me how I am wrong. Given that you have repeatedly beat the drum of the lack of opportunity for rifle hunter argument, I am eager to hear your response. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
....and if there are issues with 100 mule deer eating people crops then why are they going on draw for archers? and why aren't the landowners giving permission to those hunters who ask? LC |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
....we are just going to have to wait for the reply....
LC |
Well I got a reply to my letters. AFGA was kind enough to send me an entire magazine!
http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/j...2E9DCA9EB5.jpg http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/j...2EB85F5A8C.jpg http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/j...2EA3AA27D9.jpg http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/j...2EAA194AD1.jpg http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/j...2EAF32803A.jpg |
Oh my.
Bowhunter102, 3Rivers, now Rhino81.... Running out of people to argue with.... oh wait! Jryley is still around... I think; I'll go check. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.