Originally Posted by 209x50

At the AFGA meeting a fellow stood up and spoke. He claimed he was a land owner but not in 108 or 300. Said he would sue for the right to charge for hunting on his land if OSA went through. My question is why have none of you asked yourselves why this hasn't happened already? Why haven't landowners banded together and sued for the right to charge for hunting? It happens all over in the US.
This is 2008 folks and things change, some for the good others for the bad, it is only a matter of time before such a suit is brought before a judge. Wouldn't you rather have had the opportunity to be proactive in negotiating a deal rather than reading what a judge decides is fair?
Oh that land owner who spoke up, he was sitting at Bubba and Lurch's table, maybe they could shed some light on what he was thinking.