Quote:
Originally Posted by deer hunter
i stated some factual numbers based on what you were indicating the problem was - mule deer over harvest in 357. Never said the outfitters were "big bad" as you suggest.
And now you turn it into big bad resident poachers trying to justify the over allocation to outfitters.
Now you throw in ungulate recovery as in residents should be the only people responsible for getting tags numbers cut back.
Go ahead, you can have the last word here.
|
they are cutting the outfitters allocations down to 4. Please slow down and read this.
Everybody is responsible for ungulate populations recovering
i'm frustrated because you only choose to read parts of peoples comments.