View Single Post
  #22  
Old 06-24-2013, 06:46 AM
Roughneck Country's Avatar
Roughneck Country Roughneck Country is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,060
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo View Post





It is Not a good idea!

This idea is Guaranteed to take away licences from residents.


Seems we need an example.

Allocation is 100 licences. NR capped to 10 licences.

In a separate NR Draw
- NR are guaranteed 10 licences
- Residents are limited to 90 licences

In a combined draw
- NR may draw from 0 to 10 licences
- residents may draw from 90 to 100 licences.


A separate NR draw is guaranteeing the loss of up to 10% of the tags for residents.


In my best Sheephunter typing....

Ugh.

Doesn't have to be 10%, just a set amount so it is known. My understanding is right now there could be way more than 10% of the tags going to non residents if enough of them applied and were successful, this is more of a cap on nonres opportunity. Since we have outfitter allocations (and most of the states that use the 10% allotment for non residents don't) we could adjust the percentage or cap the number of tags for non residents to be lower. Maybe 5% is the right number I don't know.
Reply With Quote