Quote:
Originally Posted by Stik'em
Is there a possibility that this is all being blown out of proportion by a libtard journalist (everyone on here complains about the media) that used the wrong words, SEIZED instead of SECURED?
How many ppl on this forum have their guns either in a rifle case or just leaned up in a closet behind a locked door, probably majority. Others have a safe, so perhaps the RCMP is securing weapons that would be easy for a looter to take. You all complain out the RCMPS incompetence (I am not disputing that) so they shouldn't be able to hold a cordon properly and therefore looters would be present.
As far as proof ownership, you all know your weapons serial numbers or at least have them on a memory card in a secure area. Well that would be proof enough, no theif is going to break into your house to take your serial number just to claim a rifle later.
I think rather then putting on the tinfoil hats and spinning like a top, wait to see when the gun owners go to claim their firearms back.
Stik'em
|
Umm, seriously? Seized or secured, the cops still removed them without due cause. How it is worded makes no difference. And I don't know about you, but I don't have my serial #'s memorised and I'd be surprised if many of the people affected do either.