[QUOTE=North of Owlseye;2265605]"Reasons" 1, 2 and 4 are not reasons, they are not arguments, they are absurd.
1. Few use them - so what? Hardly a justification for banning them.
2. They are primitive - so it the logic that says this is a 'reason' for banning them.
4. Hard to justify their use to non hunters - no one cares. Its hard to justify any hunting or hunting weapon to non hunters.[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately if the voter/lobby group is large enough the Gov't cares and in the end that's all that really matters.
|