Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy
If you guys can't present a level headed discussion on the subject to people who already own firearms, how do you plan to engage the rest of Canadians who have no need or familiarity with them?
Choosing your spokespeople more deliberately may be a good first step.
|
I kinda hate that I am agreeing with you in a thread if this nature.
This is why I started a thread with the intention of taking the CCW out of the handgun legislation discussion. It's not realistic to be pushing for it now, so why do we let it invariably dominate the conversation when handguns come up?
It always, without fail, turns into what we have gotten into here. Two or three members getting into a ridiculous circular debate using wild hypotheticals and barely relatable history.
If you are against firearms currently classed 'restricted' having the same storage, transport, and usage regulations as a 'Non-restricted', please explain in a clear, concise manner, why you feel that way.