View Single Post
  #159  
Old 01-18-2015, 10:57 PM
Red Bullets's Avatar
Red Bullets Red Bullets is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: central Alberta
Posts: 12,629
Default

I have just read through this entire thread.

Because of the bickering between the headbone hunters, the meat hunters, the treaty people, the non treaty people, the outfitters, the farmers and the government's inability to properly manage re-introduced elk it is painfully obvious that, to be fair, we will have to re-introduce wolves and cougars to the Suffield area to control elk numbers. hehe
----------
My outlook on the subsistance hunting issue...
Our wildlife, whether introduced or native, is all Albertan's wildlife. Since the animals are the crowns animals (and we create our gov't) we as a whole society, native and non native combined, have the responsibility to manage our wildlife.

Because the suffield elk populations are just a grand gov't. experiment, our government should cull and harvest the Suffield elk in a manner that is fair to all people. It might be best if designated government hunters culled the Suffield elk and the meat distributed to our provinces food banks and maybe lunch programs for schools. The food banks deal with actual people (FN too) that are in need. School lunch programs feed all of our children.

This approach would take everybodies egos out of the equation.

Subsistance hunting has a place in remote areas, which Suffield is not.
__________________
___________________________________________
This country was started by voyagers whose young lives were swept away by the currents of the rivers for ten cents a day... just for the vanity of the European's beaver hats. ~ Red Bullets
___________________________________________
It is when you walk alone in nature that you discover your strengths and weaknesses. ~ Red Bullets

Last edited by Red Bullets; 01-18-2015 at 11:10 PM.