Quote:
Originally Posted by coreya3212
No, because the reason I oppose the change is because I don't see a need to restrict hunt able public land. All the arguments for this change that I have read are covered in existing law. If I shoot Unsafely down a 15 ft wide cut line I can be charged with an offence. If I shoot over private land with out permission I can be charged with an offence. If I enter property I don't have permission to enter for any reason, I can be charged with an offence. It's all covered folks. It seems to me this law is proposed by landowners looking to add 20 m to their portfolio and keep others out. Not right in my mind.
|
And there we have a major reason why we see so much denied access. The attitude that says screw the concerns of those "greedy land owners" and to he!! with any reasonable compromise.