Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
Great job by the admin, as the discussion has been good. I have written several letters to both the previous and present government regimes concerning both the allocation system, and the fact that convicted outfitters do not have their allocations revoked, and are still allowed to outfit. In every instance , the response has been the same, that been that the government will not involve themselves in these matters, they leave all disciplinary actions to APOS. But given that even the APOS president has been convicted of offences; why would anyone expect APOS to discopline it's members for being convicted of violations? And why would the members vote to allow a convicted offender to represebt their association?
|
A lot of times these outfitters that are convicted do not hold title to the Allocations Elk11. How does APOS go about stripping Allocations from members that are not convicted of anything.
Take good old Loyd for instance. I don't think that guy has his name on any of his Allocations yet its his business.
Said this many times before it isn't as easy as you would think. It's a lot of legality issues which APOS can't afford to fight for "doing the right thing".