Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo
Tork, Are you purposefully trying to mislead? If not, How could you Not know the facts?
APOS, sure as Lloyd being a Poacher, IS FULLY and Completely responsible for governing sanctions against APOS membership outfitters that break the law!
This commentary below is COMPLETE GARBAGE!, likely as an attempt to fool those that read it.
APOS is THE delegated authority, in charge of developing and enforcing rules that Outfitters and guides must follow to be a member in good standing, as both a business or Director!
Yes, the Government could intervene and make APOS change their bylaws.
OR, APOS could manage themselves as promised by signing to be the delegated authority, and making and Enforcing new bylaws that truly punishes the stink out of their ranks.
From the Wildlife Act Regulations.
(Section 10(2) of this Regulation)
The Alberta Professional Outfitters Society
Interpretation of Schedule
1(1) In this Schedule,
(a) “by‑laws” means the by‑laws made by the Society under section 10;
(b) “fiscal year” means the fiscal year of the Society, as specified in the by‑laws;
(c) “Society” means the Alberta Professional Outfitters Society referred to in section 2(1).
Continuation of delegated authority, and delegated functions
2(1) The Alberta Professional Outfitters Society is continued as a delegated authority referred to in section 104(1)(b) of the Act.
(2) The Society is delegated the following powers, duties and functions, to be carried out in accordance with the Act, this Regulation and the objects and by‑laws of the Society:
(a) the issue of outfitter‑guide permits and guides’ designations;
(b) the distribution, including transfers, of allocations;
(c) the issue of non‑resident alien licences authorizing the hunting of big game animals;
(d) the collection of fees for licences, permits and guides’ designations;
(e) the designation of, and the setting of the qualifications for, guides;
(f) the cancellation and suspension of licences, permits and guides’ designations, issued by the Society;
(g) establishment of the kinds of protection of deposits required by section 57(2) of this Regulation.
|
Really ? So APOS could impose a ruling banning an individual from participating in the outfitting industry the same as the crown could ?
I’d love to see that one play out in court !!!
How about APOS telling the government what the non resident allocation numbers are going to be going forward, and not the other way around?
You think that will fly ?
Surely the governing body would decide all manner of process for that sector of government???