Quote:
Originally Posted by 41thunder
This is the craziest thing I’ve ever heard
So your saying landowners can’t be outfitters
And outfitters can’t own land because it would be a conflict of interest
Give your head a shake
What gives anyone the right to tell people who they can allow to access their land
Hunting or anything else
If you haven’t realize by the time you have become an adult that money talks
I don’t know what planet you were raised on
Everyone does not deserve equal access and opportunities
You charge these landowners and **** them off
They and their friends will lock down their land to everyone
|
You’re not making any sense. Lay off the devils lettuce buddy. Landowners can be outfitters. No issue there. But they in my opinion cannot own tags and lease the property as it is illegal to provide access for payment. This issue if left unchecked leads to a very detrimental precedent in our hunting access opportunities. I fully understand your thoughts on property rights, but look up hunting access for sale in Alberta and educate yourself. Your argument has zero basis. If these 2 people can blatantly tell the viewing public that they’re leasing land to hunt and raise deer on, that in my opinion needs to be looked into. Your arguement is faulty.
Furthermore, in Alberta, everyone does deserve equal access and opportunity. In this case, this property is locked down and access is denied to everyone other than this crew.