Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter
Wasn't notice that it was about to expire served?
|
Sheephunter,
The agreement was made. The intent was to make it interim to see if it would be suitable as is or if it had to be amended prior to implementation of a more permanent Harvesting agreement.
There was a clause in it that allowed either side to give 90 days notice if the applicable party wanted to opt out of it.
The original intent was to allow further negotiations to allow both parties to build on the interim agreement.
However as soon as there was a change in power of the existing Government there was no intent to build onto the interim agreement or to enter into meaningful discussions. Notice was served by the Government and the IMHA was history.
Thanks,
Rafter