08-04-2010, 02:05 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 209
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newfierefugee
You're all missing my point here, I never once said that I don't like it. I pulled and posted a clip from a website and got torn a new ass for it. It's my personal choice not to target this species, and i'm not putting my choice on anyone else.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newfierefugee
Considering Sturgeon are classified as a species at risk, they should not be targeted.
Killing, harming, etc., listed wildlife species
32. (1) No person shall kill, harm, harass, capture or take an individual of a wildlife species that is listed as an extirpated species, an endangered species or a threatened species.
http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/approach/act/Part9a_e.cfm
|
Really? Then you might want to re-think the way you word things.. saying "they should not be targeted" and then quoting a regulation is quite different from saying "it's my opinion that they should not be targeted".
|