Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryF
Facts on Bullshead, prior to regs changes, 70,000 fish stocked annually, after 5 years of regs changes, now stocked with 20,000 fish. Plain math shows a 50,000 fish lower stocking rate just by having these changes. Based on that there is a possible reduction of 24,000 fish stocked in K lakes. Just between those 2 areas there would be enough money for another CO to be out there as all of us believe there are not enough CO's to do the job.
|
Assuming that your facts are accurate.
Well, I'm no mathematician and I don't know the difference between plain and fancy math but............If you reduce the possession limit from 3 fish to 1 (or 66%), doesn't it make sense that there would be a requirement to stock 66% fewer fish in order to maintain the same fish population?
This proposal is not about saving money or getting more CO's so you might as well take that off of the table now.