Quote:
Originally Posted by Sundancefisher
HunterDave... I am sure you don't mean to say that all the people that want fishing options and pay their licencing fees should be forced to only follow what you want. That goes to my early question you would not answer.
Still...if that is your opinion it is a tiny minority when compared to the poll results.
I would say if you want to protect Carson as a put and take lake...then as part of any future discussions, that could very well be the case. But another lake may make better sense as a trophy or quality lake or another regulation as suggestions in this poll.
Any thoughts?
|
Well if you're sure that is not what I meant then why mention it?
The majority of anglers want to be able to catch fish, not just big fish, but fish. They want to go out and enjoy a day of fishing just to enjoy the outdoors, spend time with their families, yadda, yadda, yadda. It doesn't matter that I happen to agree with the majority.
And what makes you think that people should be forced to follow your way as opposed to my way anyway? Is it somehow different to force people to chose your way because you think that it is better or that's what you want?
Awhile back you went on a huge campaign to try to get Kananaskis changed to a "quality" fishery yet you only managed to get a total of 283 signatures on the petition. So what, if anything, did you learn from that?
If you want to refer to the attached poll to prove your point how about starting a poll that will give you accurate results. How many people would have voted for this one:
Limit of 5 any size with a good chance of fish over 20"
Not possible? Yeah, it is, because some of us have that choice now.
And you want me to give that up so it's easier for you to catch bigger fish? All that I can say to that is..............
