Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckBrat
17 of lets say 300 Trout fisheries =5.6%, Alberta Wide-661,848 square kilometers
Manitoba's Parkland Area 32,000 Square KM's 20 of 43 fisheries in one small area managed for trophy trout experience. 20/43=46%
|
Nice how you only used a small number of lakes in Manitoba verses all of the trout lakes in Alberta in order to come up with a disproportionate percentage.
Shoot, why didn't you just use the 20 lakes that you selected and say 100% of the lakes are trophy lakes?
I bet that I can pick an area in Manitoba with 43 lakes that doesn't have a single trout lake, let alone a "quality" one, amongst them. So what?
Would that be some sort of proof that in comparison we have too many lakes classed as "quality" fisheries.
Okay, now that I have nailed down the facts for you fellas about how many "quality" lakes there are in Alberta, and it wasn't 2, does anyone want to do a count of the number of C&R lakes and add them to the total number of "quality" lakes?
