View Single Post
  #168  
Old 04-11-2011, 08:00 PM
Sundancefisher's Avatar
Sundancefisher Sundancefisher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary Perchdance
Posts: 19,029
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browning375 View Post
I Agree!

Trout ponds are dime a dozen in alberta, we need some variety around here. I would like something diferent than a muddy tasting trout!
Problem is from a management perspective if you want any harvest and a reasonable fishery...rainbow trout are the only option for the smaller pothole lakes. There just is not the reproduction nor the food base to support pike and walleye. Perch are not viable due to stunting. Even bass would not work in a put and take lake unless they were catch and release due to expected environmental stress and reproductive limitations.

Only larger lakes...Newell, McGregor, Wabamun, Pigeon, Gull, Sylvan would work. Maybe Buffalo...maybe South Buck. These are big enough that a limited harvest could be sustained.

A smallie fishery would only be a unique fishery like the grayling in Bear and Quarry. As such...very limited harvest to C&R for regs.

As mentioned before...to switch Gull to a smallie fishery would mean heavy stocking of smallmouths for at least 10 years. Then stopping only after a few years of documented successful spawning as seen through population sampling. To make it cost effective...generous limits would have to be applied for pike and walleye...maybe even lake whitefish. After success...then they can restrict harvest of the predators. Monitoring would have to occur after that to establish a species composition ratio and biomass and track every few years to see if they are declining or what.

It is expensive...massive out cry from locals would occur...significant cost and manpower. Cost could be offset with special license surcharge.

Who would agree to it? I don't think enough would agree.
Reply With Quote