View Single Post
  #143  
Old 05-08-2011, 09:18 PM
alodar's Avatar
alodar alodar is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatorhunter View Post
No cause the fish is a walleye and the evidence presented in court by an officer will show the fish to be walleye. It is up to the accused to know what he is fishing for. If the regulations show walleye, how can the accused show that he was fishing for "pickerel" when there are no pickerel in the regulations of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Northwest Ontario?.
Oh here it is.

Also the reg excerpt im referring to is the one named 10guide.pdf page 5 of 17
Reply With Quote