View Single Post
  #74  
Old 04-19-2010, 09:45 PM
spopadyn spopadyn is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 222
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Okotokian View Post
Well, the "no statistical difference" comment is at least arguable/debatable. Check this study and a few of the others it references.
http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/cg.../full/fsn067v1
Here is the conclusion from your study:

In contrast, the use of barbless hooks results in a small reduction in unhooking time (so it was assumed that the mortality rate could be improved), but at the cost of a dramatically reduced cpue. Hence, in our case, we conclude that, unlike with the effect of hook size, the use of barbless hooks does not provide any significant advantage from a conservation perspective.

Here is the info out of wikipedia for goodness sake:

Most actual scientific studies regarding post release mortality have shown however that barbless hooks do not result in statistically significantly lower mortality rates than barbed hooks.[4]

As I said before - useless law designed to make money for the F&W team
Reply With Quote