i would also pay more for a license if it meant the money went back into the fisheries, actually I should say I would support the idea of paying more, regardless of cost I will buy a fishing Lisence every year. I wonder though would we lose revenue if a good number of people who are not avid anglers decided that 50 or 80 dollars was a crazy price and decided against purchasing a lisence where they normally would have bought one? I know a few people that think it's to expensive at its current rate, where I personally couldn't care less what it's costs because I fish every opportunity I have. As for species I'd like to see, I actually am fairly happy with what we have I just wish there was more closer to Edmonton, tiger trout would be cool, and sunfish/pumpkinseed whatever you want to call them would be a fun addition to some of the little potholes.
|