View Single Post
  #134  
Old 06-27-2015, 10:40 PM
Unregistered user Unregistered user is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morpheus32 View Post
A bunch of you seem fixated on the contract cost. The individual rifle is not worth $6700 replacement cost, the system over 30 years is what the cost is. Let's do a comparison, DND is buying a rifle that is to last 30 years with everyday use. So exchange rifle for a truck, DND is pre buying the parts and maintenance on the truck for 30 years. It is also buying a complete rebuild of the truck around the 15 year point so you get another new truck in essence. Plus spares so the systems don't have shortages during rebuild and regular maintenance. This allows the truck to remain in service for 30 years and meet the needs of DND.

So the purchase is not for a single rifle but rather the rifle and the means to maintain the rifle in service for the next 30 years including a rebuild and spares.
Therein lies the problem, antiquated thinking. Fleet purchases try the very best to minimize maintenance costs and that means sell them off before the repairs kill you. From cars to trucks to D10 Cats you don't flog a dead horse. Motivate a ranger to keep his kit in good working order and let him keep it after 2 or 3 years, then buy him a new one. These guys are growing up shooting guns whilst city kids are jonesing for playdates. As Homer said, "A gun is not a weapon Marge, it's a tool like a butcher's knife or a harpoon or an alligator. Seriously though, what happened to all the old C1A1s that were taken out of service and never sold back to us lowly tax-payers? If we still have them, use them and run 'em. When they're too expensive to fix, sell them to collectors, we all win. It's just a friggin' gun.
Reply With Quote