Quote:
Originally Posted by thumper
By the letter of law, even a photographer pursuing an animal to take photos, could be charged.
|
Not quite - since the "letter of the law" includes a clause exempting photographers from the definition of "hunting".
(2) A person
shall not be regarded as having hunted a subject
animal
(a) for the purposes of subsection (1)(o)(ii), if
(i) the person was not carrying a weapon, and
(ii) the purpose of the person’s activity was restricted to
watching,
photographing, drawing or painting a
picture of the animal,