View Single Post
  #23  
Old 10-19-2009, 10:07 AM
Cal Cal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: slave lake
Posts: 4,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheephunter View Post
Ya, not really sure it fills any gap as there really isn't one there and truthfully, there isn't a ton of difference between a .325WSM and a .338WM performance wise. The .325 was some slick American advertising. It's not a .325 cal but an 8mm but it seems Americans will not embrace new metric cartridges so they called it something it's not. Nothing wrong with the cartridge and I'm sure it would do eveything you could ask it to but my prediction is that it will have a pretty short life span in commercial rifles. Not sure why they just didn't call it a .338WSM....something hunters were familiar with. Bullet availability would be my only concern versus a .338 WM.
Just to clarify, you mean that there is no gap betweenthe .338WM and the .325WSM right? The way you've got it written it almost sounds like you are saying that you dont think there is much difference between the .300WM and the .338WM which is starteling news to me.
Reply With Quote