Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveller11
"Originally Posted by bat119 View Post
That's what I thought the only plausible explanation was a hangfire as the trigger can't be pulled when a cartridge is out of battery, the bulged case is proof that the cartridge was not completely in the chamber."
Yes, you're correct. The trigger on a Tokarev cannot release the hammer until the action is completely forward and the locking lugs engaged. If this occurred, the cartridge would be fully chambered.
So, you believe it was a hangfire, meaning something had to detonate the primer of the cartridge.
How do you suppose that happened?
|
Explaine what you think happened. How did the shell discharge out of battery? It was clearly not chambered correctly. If you have the answers then please tell us. Please duplicate what happened on video.
Could you replicate the blown out case that jambed the gun the firearms expert testified to with 3 rounds? The dud? How many to make rounds to make it happen?
A correct functioning firearm would need correct functioning ammo? They kinda go hand in hand. One doesn't work well then the other won't. The ammo was proven defective.
If you have the evidence that the crown needs to appeal this then why waste time here? Please in detail explaine what happened. Please.please please. Explain the bulge case.
If you don't like the decision then start asking the crown on the charges that they decided to lay. Maybe If the decided to lay manslaughter charge, MAYBE, there would have been a different outcome on the trail.