thoughts
this is a step in the right direction. the only way in my opinion that something like this works is if the membership is 100% of the participants involved. what i would like to see is a checkoff paid when a wildlife certificate is purchased and then everyone is a member. My issue with the AFGA is that a small portion of the hunting population is a paying member. those members then work on an agenda that is not including all members of the hunting community. i said this before in a post a while back, that because i am involved in the industry, a model replicating the Alberta Beef Producers is what i would support. The zones are already in place. Each zone has reps elected, then out of that chairmen and so on are then elected or appointed. this infighting amongst each other has no purpose nor does it give direction. it serves as fodder for the people in which we are having issues with. one group with a 100% membership, thats the way to go.
|