Quote:
Originally Posted by HyperMOA
Actually most of the world. But not too long ago the sulphur in diesel was much higher too. I am not saying its perfect, but cutting 84% of the sulphur in marine diesel will amount to big changes. Then when technology and retrofits catch up the marine fuel might end up at 10ppm too. Doesn’t it make sense to incrementally implement standards and improve emissions? Makes more sense to me than banning or taxing with no other alternatives.
|
It makes sense to demand that all ships entering Canadian harbors burn 10ppm fuel, before they implement a carbon tax on the much cleaner burning fuel that we burn in Canada. But Trudeau and sense don't mix .