Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynamic
I find it weird that we will listen to experts on subjects such as hunting, fishing, or anything that you find interesting. We listen and accept the word from the experts because we acknowledge that they know more about the subject than we do. But when the general consensus from leading climate scientists ( a.k.a. Experts ) so many people just have their heads in the sand.
|
Lot of 'experts' on hunting and fishing have left this forum because of having their experience and knowledge constantly questioned and often proved wrong. Lots of supposed experts are not experts but are placed in positions of expertise because they are sponsored, granted, or support an agenda because of bias. If there were actual non refuted evidence pointing in one direction or the other we would all believe it. Conditional bias plays a huge roll in what we believe or don't believe when we only have anecdotal or incomplete evidence, theoretical 'evidence', rumour and heresay to base a conclusion on. It is all unproven theory without scientific proof on both sides and that's where we're at on man made/caused climate change. We only know it is currently warming which is consistent with the unpredictable yoyo climate the earth has been experienced for billions of years. With the lack of evidence the best odds and a billion year long track record of this same exact varying climate behavior would say what we are experiencing today is par for the course. It would be a total anomaly for us to have constant seasons and climate. Doesn't matter, in the long run, humans will eventually disappear or not, old mother earth will carry on and do what she does regardless of whether we are here or not.