Quote:
Originally Posted by pottymouth
It all depends on what the data shows, how accurate it was collected and what they are supposedly trying to fix. If it's numbers then, there are way better methods and more serious things to investigate.
Reducing doe, outfitter and landowner tags, is a serious resolution to
strengthening numbers.
Remember this the same people that allowed in recent years...
- Sunday hunting ( which I'm against, but that's a different thread)
- expansion of days ( they added wednesday is some eastern zones)
- opening bow season down south on Sept 1st
- Cwd fiasco
- increasing tag numbers
- having some seasons end mid Dec.
Revert some of those and you'll get that 2-3% your looking for. Bow draw isn't the solution .
|
nobody is arguing those point potty. Im
Saying yes youre correct, but again if limiting the bow harvest helps even a fraction then yes it is part of the solution. Its oretty sad bud that you feel exempt from putting in the time and effort to fixing the problem. Thats the attitude i hope gets trampled
Into the ground. We either practise effective conservation as a cumulative group, or we take no steps forward. If one group sacrifices opportunity its only expected the other group should be willing to do the same as part of a common goal. Should species listed as threatened be allowed
To be
Hunted by bow hunters simply because the harvest would in theory be
Miniscule? Give me a break potty. Selfish selfish selfish man.