Quote:
Originally Posted by gitrdun
No, he doesn't sound pathetic. In fact he is very factual, both in terms of the maximum design pressure of said firearm and of the data provided which states that chamber pressure would be extremely destructive in order to achieve the claimed velocity for said 255gr projectile.
And the thread hasn't been ruined. On the contrary, it is very informative and cautionary to anyone who may attempt likewise.
What could possibly be wrong with questioning certain claims. Are we supposed to take everything for granted as factual? And what modifications could Rman possibly have done to this rifle to take it from a maximum rating of 30,000 psi to all of a sudden nearly 50,000 psi?
|
He is not factual, at all, and niether are you.
The premise under which you have decided to come back to the forum is beyond obvious as well. Even more sad.
What is the maximum design pressure of a Winchester Model 94?
The data provided is not my data, so how is it useful? It was assembled in the worst possible way to discredit what has happened.
You, spewing rhertoric about what is safe and what isn't is beyond laughable as well...
The only thing wrong with questioning certain claims, is that niether you, or Bergerboy have actually asked any questions. It started out that way, and changed from questions to accusations.
The 50,000 psi number is your number, not mine, meaning it really is as useless as all the other other crap that has been brought to this thread by him, and now you.
The fact that you changed a CUP measurement to PSI, to better further your illusion should be enough to show that niether one of you really know what you are talking about...
R.