Quote:
Originally Posted by Newview01
We're talking origins, in the creation vs evolution debate that is generally the intent.
Obviously science is not a belief, which is why I'm always confused when evolutionists claim their theory is science. There are so many holes in their claims and missing links, a large measure of faith is required to believe the concept.
|
Missing link?
Source
"And in all of the fossils that we have (remember, we have found a lot) we haven’t discovered a single fossil indicating that evolution is wrong. Every fossil that we have has been shown to be a transitional fossil. This means that the fossils have traits in common with other fossils, some more primitive and some more advanced, as the case may be. There is no great outlier that doesn’t fit in with the theory of evolution."
Some missing human links, discovered:
https://www.livescience.com/11326-to...ing-links.html
Transitional fossils:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil
Tiktaalik was predicted to exist before it was found in the Canadian Arctic 13 years ago. This is only one exampe.