Quote:
Originally Posted by elkhunter11
They should, but they don't. 
Where APOS is concerned, nothing counts but the money, and perhaps that is why so many APOS members, including some past members of the executive have a record of convictions for violations. For those people, money even comes before the regulations. And even after they have been convicted several times for both violations of the Wildlife Act, and the Criminal Act, they are allowed to remain a member of APOS, and they get to keep their allocations and keep outfitting. |
And again it's APOS fault the rules are the rules. It's business and your the little man that does not contribute to the pile as much as a Non resident.
It's the Govt rules that allows outfitting!!!
And there are rules as well to what license you can take away from someone that is convicted of breaking the law. You bring up Mcmohan for instance and I highly doubt his name is on anything legal pertaining to outfitting. There are ways around it all and it is not the fault of APOS for most of it.
You guys are fighting big business here. You can't win much. I don't like the way some of it is either but some of the whining going on is retarded.
Some of you guys may spend a few bucks in the province but it doesn't come close to what is spent from Non Residents.