Quote:
Originally Posted by walking buffalo
For 2008-2012, NRHH purchased 1.2% of all the draw antlered Moose, Trophy pronghorn and Antlered mule deer licences.
I offered a way to increase MD draw licences by 100% while others are focused on the 1%. Which option could actually make a difference?
|
The 2008-2012 numbers cannot be used to accurately account for the numbers of NR/NRHH that are
currently plugging up our draw system.
Think about it. they would have needed anywhere from a P3-P8 on most of these draws to get drawn and be included in the 2008-2012 survey. Meaning those NRHH representing 1.2%
of the drawn started applying in the early to mid 2000's.
Those in the draw system today are much greater than 1.2%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudelpointer
Wow, are you ever barking up the wrong tree.
You have been given the NR numbers, but you still want to focus on <2% of the drawn tags. Making that handful of tags unavailable to the fathers/brothers/mothers/sisters/children and life long friends of Alberta resident will surely solve this problem....  |
Speaking of barking. The numbers you a WB continue to cite are irrelevant and misleading. Therefore you are misleading people in your defense of NR's in the draw system.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullgetter
Exactly because they DO NOT live here!
|
X2
I consider it an injustice if a single resident has to wait even one extra year because a NR is taking his place in a limited draw hunt.