Quote:
Originally Posted by CBintheNorth
While I can see both sides of the arguments here, this statement comes closest to describing my thoughts on the subject.
The issue was raised by a hunting organisation (the president to be more precise), not an anti-hunting group.
And they didn't ask for it to be regulated, they asked for a ban.
Poor decision in my opinion.
|
Yes initially, but as was explained the focus was changed to define and regulate, not ban (BRL statement above)....which some folks can't get past, and perhaps never will get past.
Like many I do not support an all out ban without first trying to define/regulate.
I had a discussion with a F&W officer today and this doesn't even seem to be on their radar....maybe I shouldn't have told them
LC