View Single Post
  #45  
Old 04-17-2018, 07:38 AM
catnthehat's Avatar
catnthehat catnthehat is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ft. McMurray
Posts: 38,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pistolero1860 View Post
Just for the education of us all, would you mind listing all of the"multiple" firearms laws that Mr. Stanley broke?

- Not unsafe storage of a restricted weapon - that was unsubstantiated.
- Unsafe storage of an unrestricted firearm was substantiated.

But what other firearms laws were broken?
What other firearms laws has he been charged under?

Also, stating that Mr. Stanley actually profited from the donations received sounds like you have a distinct prejudice against a man receiving a fair trial without being financially destroyed.
he is stating about the same as you did stating that it's unlikely that his family members will not be able to get PAL''s renewed.
Rav Yak did not state that he actually did, he thought he may have.
Lots of guessing going on here and no one knows for sure until things actually have happened , then opinions like the verdict being fair in a trial are just that- opinions.
Cat.
__________________
Anytime I figure I've got this long range thing figured out, I just strap into the sling and irons and remind myself that I don't!