Do you question the accuracy of the technology PuffyPants? Therein lies your only defence. The crown has already put forth their case that the technology is sound. They have provided the burden of proof. So now it is up to you to refute their claim.
Or is your argument that the registered owner of a vehicle does not assume any responsibility for that vehicle? Is your not guilty plea not a lie because you actually were not driving the vehicle at the time? Would it be different if your vehicle were the getaway car for a bank robbery? Do you still bear no responsibility for the vehicle?
|