Quote:
Originally Posted by tallieho
Shep; I can't quite understand your position.I no myself that when the lake was stocked .Prior to it being disegnated a QSF.The lake was stocked yearly with 100,000+ ,for many years.To have the lake be returned to a put & take fishery.Would imo be a huge loss,to us fisherman.It's pretty dam obvious that,the attraction is the now large fish.In these days of cost cutting stocking 100,000 fish at approx. $100.00 a kg,so $60-70,000.Versus stocking 10,000 .The dollar savings pay for the aeration.Back when the place was aput & take fishery.The campground was rarely full.Now even the overflow is full.
|
My position is that the ACA has a budget. I sincerely hope we can all agree on that simple fact.
Aerating your favourite Put-and-Take stocked fishery may not be possible ($) or sensible, given the ACA's mandate.
There's no doubt in my mind that the ACA receives complaints from amateur fishery biologists on a regular basis.