Quote:
Originally Posted by 6.5 shooter
So your a Lawyer ?
|
Don't need to be a lawyer to see that they are cherry picking to suit their/Turdo's/UN's agenda of disarming the public one slice at a time.
Also note,even if they do in fact have a weak argument for the prohib on Ruger mags,it is ONLY the Ruger branded BX-25 mags that are specifically marketed and packaged as "for use in 10/22 Charger pistol".....hence the mess to begin with.
ie;Butler CreekHotLips/Steel Lips mags,GSG 110 drum mags etc. make no mention of the Charger in their marketing,and like the Ruger BX mags,predate the pistol by decades,so how can they be designed for a firearm that didn't even exist?The only difference is Ruger made the mistake of specifically mentioning the Charger in marketing the BX mags,hence the jack boot thugs have concluded(wrongly) that the mags are designed for the pistol,when in fact it's the other way around,the pistol was designed to be compatible with the 10/22 platform and related accessories.
By the same flawed logic,one could assume that EVERY standard capacity 10rd pistol mag in Canada that also happens to fit in a Pistol Cartridge Carbine such as the Kriss Vectors,Beretta CX4 Storm etc etc would be a prohibited device,as would all of the LAR-15 and Beuwolf mags etc....and that is simply not the case.
Again,it goes back to "the firearm for which the magazine was originally designed and manufactured for" as clearly stated in RCMP's very own Special Bulletin 72....but in classic Libtard twisted logic,neutering 1 million+ in country rabbit rifles and tin can plinkers is paramount to enhancing public safety....gimme a break!!🙄