Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Abelard
Miller seems blind to longstanding presence of cultural and political influences in the classroom. His ignorance is surprising for someone in his position.
What *IS* Miller's concern? Is he concerned with non-fundamentals being included in the curriculum? Or is he just concerned with the presence of ideas he doesn't agree with?
The "Three Rs" methodology is 200 years old - Miller's recommendations are the best 1800 has to offer.
Miller's criticisms come off as an aging person's discomfort with change, more than they do informed criticism of the educational system.
Increasingly, it's clear that a portion of our society is non-binary. Some may dismiss this as a social experiment or fad, but more likely it's biological variations that have been suppressed by culture.
I'd rather have these folks acknowledged and included, than suffering in silence, and eventually killing themselves.
(ps. Any link to this article? )
|
what do you mean with binary
as far as I know male sex is male gender
female sex is female gender
that is how I read it in Genesis
we do not like the leftish line ot Trudeau- Notley -Eggen
that's why we agree with the article of Miller
if kids have questions about gender they should ask at home instead of the socialist ideas they teach them at school