Quote:
Originally Posted by BeeGuy
If you actually read his post you'll see that he said one was 27''.
Those fish are both clearly over the 24'' mark. Very clearly.
Assuming the size of a fish from a photo is a foolish endeavor at the best of times.
Either way, they are both large specimens of BR Browns...
|
It is not foolish, you were asking for monster trout and people are posting pics of average fish claiming to be 27&30", c'mon. I am aware of FH7s age and all, but he should know better, with amount and quality of fish he catches there is no need to exagarrate. It is very easy to figure out a false claim if you've seen fish(BT) of actual size 30"+. i'm not trying to put anyone down, in my books fh7 is a top fisherman and a great addition to this forum.
Just for fun, compare fishermanguys size and his fish which measures "only" 29" and looks to be dwarfing fh7s fish. I've pulled 32" BT out of glenmore and know what i'm talking about.
Cheers